Writes Alexandra Lorenz. A long time ago, when I was a child, I always wondered - why did archeologists dig everything up? Why are all the ancient cities buried under impressive layers of soil, sand, rubble and clay? I asked my parents, pointing them to the ancient buildings on the floor of the floor, immersed in the ground - why? I was offered a completely traditional version of the "gradual immersion of buildings in the ground" and the "growth of the cultural layer." I was completely confused by a small film about archaeological excavations in Mangazeya. I myself saw with my own eyes how archaeologists excavated the remains of the city at a depth of more than two meters! But it is known that in the extreme North the cultural layer is growing very slowly. The usual 1 cm. Over 100 years of soil growth, as in the middle belt, is far from being observed here. A motel in the tundra grows two months a year, almost no decay takes place. And everything is kept very well. And nowadays you can find the remains of expeditions killed in the early twentieth century and enjoy the supplies from their provisions.Why did Mangazeya find herself at such a depth? Here you can remember and Troy, and Babylon, and the buried Sphinx and almost all archaeological finds.
Further more. We learn not only to look, but also to see. Here is the Hermitage. I myself am surprised how I had previously paid no attention to the disproportionality of the first and second floors! After all, looked at him hundreds of times! Please note - the first floor is significantly lower than the second and looks down to earth. And the windows, the very windows that were supposed to be above the ground, are almost completely immersed in it. I tried to reconstruct part of the facade (I apologize for the inept photoshop), but now you can imagine how the palace should look like. It is quite another matter! He is just handsome. Everything is harmonious.
I remember that many of the halls of the Winter Palace are located below ground level. Who would do submerged rooms in a marshland? Moreover, the basement is obviously more expensive than the first floor. It is always cheaper to just make a foundation and put the first floor on it than to arrange a second-rate room and waterproof it. Not without reason, in modern construction you will not find semi-basements.Only if it is predetermined by additional technical conditions.
And in the last figure, we see the level of the land surrounding the buildings well above the level in the courtyards. Look - the house on the right - inside the courtyard, the first floor is not buried in the ground, but from the street it is a semi-basement.
Something in the 20th century, the house did not sit down, for all a hundred years. This is not difficult to prove. Look at the photo.
View of the Trinity-Izmailovsky Cathedral in 1903 and 2012. The central building was built later, it is without a semi-basement. But the building to the right did not drop a bit.How was the basement in 1903, and remained in 2012.
But let's move on to other regions. I collected thousands of photos of houses with the first floors listed. They are in the central part of Russia, in the south, and in Siberia there are many of them.
Here is Arkhangelsk:
Here is Vladikavkaz:
Here is Kostroma:
The list can be continued for a very long time. By the way, in the last photo we see a typical example: “wooden houses on stone basements”. Absolutely not reasonable from the point of view of common sense solution - to build a basement of stone, almost the first recessed floor, and on it - a wooden structure. This can be explained only by the fact that the one-story stone building was brought with soil as a result of the disaster, and we had to urgently build on it a new one from what was at hand. There are many such buildings in St. Petersburg and in other cities. They are depicted by artists at the end of the 19th century, so the version of the “subsidence” and “cultural layer” does not work. And judge for yourself how a cultural layer can accumulate in a city - are they not sweeping the streets here?
A version concerning Petersburg was voiced, saying that an additional layer of earth was formed as a result of the deepening and clearing of canals and rivers.But from the Axonometric plan we definitely see that the houses were already immersed in 1765, only 62 years after the foundation of St. Petersburg. Meanwhile, on the same plane there are no embankments yet, and the canals are not dug in, but there are only drainage ditches. And judge for yourself - how could the builders allow themselves to fall asleep the floor of the royal palace? Well, what a merchant's house, and the noise will be, and the palace? Probably, they would find a way to take out the soil.
The points above і are arranged by the fact of the excavation of the Luzhitsky monastery in Mozhaisk. In 1999 around him a layer of earth was removed about 2 meters. The former level of the walls was exposed, and gravestones of the 18th-19th centuries were dug out, which suggests that the catastrophe happened not so long ago. By the way, the church has become quite harmonious. I have long paid attention to the extraordinary "squat" of our temples. Bell towers, towers, as if caps are not in size, pinned on a dwarf. Everything is explained simply: everywhere everything is covered with a layer of soil of 1.5-2 m, and the churches, half submerged in the ground, lost their original appearance.
Here we come to the most important assumption. The fact is that now they are talking and writing a lot about the former greatness of Hyperborea, Great Tartaria, Russians and Slavs in general.But somehow it does not fit - how could such a great power suddenly collapse? We see that our ancestors possessed unprecedented technology, vast state, enormous wealth. And where did all this sink? How could the dark forces seize power and wipe almost all evidence of our past from history? How did they manage to plunge mankind into the darkness of the Middle Ages?
Only one answer can be given to this - the Great Tartary was destroyed by the Global Catastrophe. The cosmic-scale disaster wiped out almost the entire population of the largest country in the world, the Russians, and threw them into the Stone Age. We can only try to determine -whatwas it a disaster?
Probably, and most likely, mankind had to endure several such catastrophes. Surely they were of a different nature - the displacement of the poles, the global tsunami, the volcanic winter, etc. But the last catastrophe, and as we see, it happened quite recently (200-300 years ago), is somehow connected with the precipitation of soil and sand. Most likely, it was accompanied by other phenomena (earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, meteo-phenomena, strong and prolonged cooling) - here the word is a true scientist.But the fact that the European part of Russia and Siberia is littered with soil, cosmic dust or something else there is no doubt. At the same time, it is clear that Western Europe and other continents have not suffered such a blow. Maybe they will correct me, but I have not found anywhere else so many buildings submerged in the ground.
As for St. Petersburg, he probably also suffered flooding. But not such that the city was completely swept away from the face of the earth, although the buildings were significantly damaged. There is a theory according to which the Neva was formed quite recently. Note that on the old maps of Lake Ladoga either not at all, or it is very small. The researcher A.A. Nikonov arrived at the conclusion of the disaster. He discovered that at some time the waters of Lake Ladoga had broken through to the Baltic near the Ivanovo rapids. Similar events occurred in Karelia and in our time, when a whole lake suddenly descended. However, Nikonov sends us to distant historical distances, as is customary in traditional history (TI), and we see that this catastrophe happened quite recently. And one can find a lot of evidence, albeit not explicit, thanks to the efforts of falsifiers, but, nevertheless, lying on the surface.
Take at least the medal that you sent to Catherine II in 1796."In memory of the rule over the two countries"
Here we do not find the Neva River, although other rivers, even small ones, are very clearly marked. But on the site of the Neva depicted "Lake Nevsky." What is it? Mapper Error? And what kind of lake are these? What do our scientists know about them?
Here is another simple example. If you build a graph of population growth in Russia, then its rear end, given the known pace, it rests on the notorious 1700 year. Around these times (plus or minus a hundred years) the population of our country was almost completely destroyed.
However, we are invited to believe the version that several hundred thousand of our ancestors teleped over the territory of our country for tens of centuries in order to increase the population in an explosion-like manner. Wherever you go, everything is explosive in our country: population growth, technical progress, and the development of productive forces. And all this is tolerances for the sake of official science. I do not believe. I do not believe that there were 2-3 children in Russian families, and then abruptly switched to 10-14. It is also true that our ancestors wore the same clothes for thousands of years, rode carts and lived in huts.And then suddenly they invented everything, or almost everything that is technical in the whole world.
Only a catastrophe can explain the sudden destruction of a great country, the neglect of ancient knowledge and technology, the loss of Vedic faith, the Europeanization of Aryan culture.
A. Kungurov and other researchers are trying to explain the death of the Great Tartary by a nuclear strike of hostile forces. Demonstrate numerous craters and craters. This nuclear strike is considered by Alexei Kungurov because he lives in the 21st century, if he lived in the 19th, the blow would have been a trotyl. Meanwhile, if you look at the Moon closest to us, or Mars, or Mercury, or other satellites of the planets that are not covered by the atmosphere, we will find a picture similar to some regions of the Earth. Indeed, the lakes near Chelyabinsk resemble lunar craters. Only the presence of the biosphere on our planet quickly smooths such a relief, turning it into reservoirs, hiding it with vegetation and destroying it with man-made means.
But if you think about it, our astronomers have never witnessed at least one impact of a meteorite that led to the formation of a crater. Common sense dictates that in order for a crater with a diameter of tens and even hundreds of kilometers to be formed, a blow of enormous force is necessary.There are huge craters carved out of solid granite rock. Such blows, which most likely would have split the entire planet.
It is worth remembering the crater Lanaf 400 kilometers from Mumbai. The soil here is solid basalt - a very solid stone. However, the “asteroid” knocked out a hole 500 meters deep and 2000 meters deep by 500 meters. No traces of the cosmic body, like in other craters, were found.
In addition, there are no explanations why in some cases there are slides in the middle of the craters, while others do not exist. Moreover, these slides are not composed of meteoritic matter, but just keep the layers in the section, as well as outside the explosion.
There is a theory of S.I. Sukhonos, and his article “Craters of the Third Kind on the Surface of Planets and the Aetheric Hypothesis of Their Origin”, to which I also address you. I will tell you more about this topic in other articles, but for now I’ll just point out that the author suggests a completely different crater formation mechanism.
In his opinion, craters are formed as a result of the collision of a torus soliton - an “ether donut” with the matter of the planet or satellite, which results in a reaction with the destruction (annihilation) of matter.It depends on the direction of rotation of the torus soliton and whether a hillock forms in the middle of the crater or not.
This theory effectively explains the numerous craters on the bodies of the Solar System, as well as the craters formed in our time on the territory of our country, which the official science doesn’t really like to recall.
But back to our sheep. I have not heard anyone notice the simple fact that there are no sandy deserts in America. Rather, in North America there is one small - Chihuahua, well, very small. But in the South I have not found. But on our continent and in Africa, well, no matter what the desert is the cemetery of a great civilization. Gobi, Sahara, Central Asia, the deserts of Kuwait - they all keep ancient cities, canals, rivers, roads, temples and pyramids under their sand. On the one hand, scientists explain this by the inept actions of our ancestors, which led to an environmental disaster. On the other hand, geologists suggest the formation of an enormous amount of sand as a result of the destruction of mountain ranges and the removal of their remains to the plain by rivers. If the first process can be calculated for tens of years, then for the second one millions are already needed.
It turns out, or our ancestors lived in the sand all the time, or the sand suddenly descended. Judging by the old maps, sand in these districts does not smell. And how else - these are densely populated areas with dozens of mighty rivers. Then where did the dunes come from? They would occupy the main agricultural land.
Take, for example, what is closer - Central Asia. A fragment of the map of 1578 is given (official chronology)
It should be noted here that on all maps earlier than 1700 (the time of the supposed catastrophe), the Caspian Sea has a completely different form. Regarding this fact, it is not necessary to make idiots from our ancestors. It can be understood even if distant geographical objects are incorrectly depicted where there are no cities, or they are described according to rare travelers.
But a densely populated area, and we see an abundance of cities around the Caspian Sea, cannot be inflicted with such global errors. There is no Aral Sea at all. Caspian - oval shape. There are a large number of rivers and cities in the area of the modern deserts, about which we have no idea. Definitely, we can conclude that the Kara-Kum and Kyzyl-Kum desert areas were densely populated. There were mountains and cities, rivers and lakes.In this case, the rivers had a completely different direction than the present. Sands are not marked on the maps.
Let's go further, on the old maps there is no Gobi desert, Takla Makan. Numerous cities and rivers are also indicated in these areas. Actually, archaeologists have found buried cities in the Gobi and other deserts, mummies do not lie. Here they only carried their finds for tens of thousands of years, which really does not fit with cartography.
But where did so much sand come from? If you believe that it caused the river, then where?
As shown by studies of the mountains in the basin of these rivers are composed entirely of other rocks. Here is what researcher V. B. Fedorovich:“In the Aral Kara-Kum, in the Big and Small Barsuki sands and on the eastern shores of the Aral Sea, the sands have a dull white color. Each grain of their rounded and polished, like the smallest pellet. (ie, it is of marine origin - my comment) These sands are composed almost exclusively of quartz alone - the most stable of minerals - and a small admixture of smaller black grains of magnetic iron ore and other ore minerals. These are old sands. Their life course was long. It is difficult to find now the remains of their ancestors.Their kind originates from the destruction of some ancient granite ridges, the remains of which are now preserved on the surface of the earth only in the form of the distant Mugodzhar mountains. But since then, many times these sands have been re-deposited by rivers and seas. So it was in the Permian time, and in the Jurassic, and in the Lower and Upper Cretaceous. The last time they were washed, sorted and redeposited were at the beginning of the Tertiary period. After that, some layers turned out to be so firmly welded with silicic acid solutions that the grains merged with the cement, forming a solid, fatty in a fracture, pure as sugar, quartzite. But the desert also acts on this strongest stone. More loose layers of sand are blown out, solid stones are destroyed, and again the sands are re-deposited, this time not by sea or river water, but by wind. ”
That is, according to the scientist, the sands here were millions of years old. It is only strange that our ancestors did not notice them. The presence of the Aral Sea and the fact that Syr-Darya and Amu-Darya do not flow into the Caspian Sea, but into the Aral Sea have not noticed either. Theoretically, the rivers could inflict sand, destroying the nearby mountains, but the bad luck - Tien Shan, Alai and Pamir are not composed of quartz deposits from which the sands of the deserts of Central Asia could have been formed. Anyway, this theory is not confirmed - many large rivers (the Ganges, the Indus, the Yangtze, the Amazon, the Amur ...), although originating in the mountains, did not form even a hint of sandy deserts. And then, it would be inexplicable behavior of people living in this region, watching as the river sands down their land. People have mastered irrigation for a very long time, and for a very long time they were able to arrange canals, change the channels of rivers, and equip the shores. But we see cities brought in by the sands. I am sure that if we excavate, then under the sand we will find clay - the remnants of the soil. That is, the fertile lands were suddenly, or covered with sand for a short time.
In the case of the European part of Russia, this is not sand, but soil or something else similar in composition to ordinary earth. Hence the explanation for the strange fact - the universal death of trees about 200 years ago. We almost do not find in our country trees older than two hundred years, even in Siberia, in the Perm Territory and other places where the forest has never been cut down completely. According to researchers in such places, the forest should look something like the one in Shishkin’s painting. Have you seen such places?
There are theories that they were destroyed as a result of a global fire. But then there would be huge ashes. And then, someone tried to calculate how much oxygen will burn out in this case from the atmosphere? More similar to the truth is the version that the surface of the Earth in some regions was covered with a layer of dust or soil. In this case, all the vegetation will die, including trees. The population will lose crops for several years, hence the famine and pestilence. If it was dust, then solar radiation will decrease, which means a strong cooling will occur.
In the above chart, the width of the annual rings of trees, we see that the strongest failures occur in ± 1698, 1742 and 1815.
That is, in these years, our territory was subjected to some kind of cataclysms.
If you look at old photographs, for example, Prokudin-Gorsky of the beginning of the century, and compare them with modern ones, then we are forced to notice that there were significantly fewer trees at that time, or they were very young. Here are the photo equations (on the left, the beginning of the 20th century):
I do not know how to explain this fact otherwise than by slowing down the growth of plants or their destruction. You can learn more about it here:
Thus, we came close to the fact that had been discovered: most of Russia relatively recently, about 200 years ago, was covered with solid precipitation. Other civilizations, Central Asia, Mesopotamia and Babylon, Egypt, Hara-Khoto (Gobi), Sahara, Takla Makan and others, most likely were covered with sand earlier. We can only guess as a result of which such a catastrophe occurred. But it was she who led to the fall of Great Tartaria.
We could assume that the Earth fell into the cosmic dust zone, but in this case the precipitations would fall more or less evenly over the entire surface of the planet. In the case of sand, we see that he lay down selectively, precisely on the areas of ancient civilizations. And in the case of the soil - on the territory of Russia. It is not clear why in one case it is sand, and in the other - soil.
There is an assumption, and it has grounds that the progress of mankind is artificially restrained by external forces. In particular, and by “falling asleep” foci of development. For example, in order to prove that this is possible, we will give a case in the Plesetsk district of the Arkhangelsk region, in 1983.
Here is what V.Fomenko writes about this (please do not confuse with the historian A.T. Fomenko) in his own book, “COMEADERS ARE ALREADY CONTROLLING THE EARTH!” (This book is a full-fledged scientific work):
"7.3.3.According to reports (remaining "for official use"), which arrived in Moscow from the Arkhangelsk region from civil defense, sanitary and epidemiological service, meteorological service and other sources, on December 15, 1983, from 8:00 am to 12:00 pm, a huge amount of dust fell from the territory of Plesetsk district (west of Plesetsk) sediment of dark gray color on an area of 160 by 80 km ...
7.3.4. Prior to this, from December 13 to December 15 there was a snowstorm with snow, almost ending by the time the dust fell. The area of dust loss according to the first, rough estimate, reported by the operational civilian duty officer, was about 2000 km2 with an average dust layer thickness of 4 cm. The air temperature at that time was -6 ° C, and the wind was 5 m / s. The top of the cone (the form of a square covered with dust had the form of an isosceles triangle with strongly rounded sides and corners, like a petal on a flower) near the village of Konevo. There were some spots. According to another report of civil defense in the area of the city of Kargopol, along with snow, dust fell on an area of 6000 km2. The thickness of the layer is up to 6 cm. The third message, the chairman of the regional executive committee, gives an area of dust deposition in the Plesetsk district of 5000 km2. When flying around in a helicopter, an area of 10,000 km2 was obtained.The Civil Defense Headquarters also informed by another telegram that between 7 and 12 o'clock on 12/15/83, black-gray dust fell in the territory adjacent to Ken Lake, in some places up to 5 cm thick. Inspection by civil defense devices showed no radiation. According to eyewitnesses, it was as dark at night as dust fell. ”
The author estimates the mass of fallen dust at 300 million tons. At the same time, the book also contains other facts of dumping solid sediments from UFOs, no less ambitious. Of course, in this case we are talking about a completely different thing - cleaning the atmosphere. But in fact, it is important for us to understand that for some intelligent beings it is not difficult to move such colossal volumes.
If we admit that our development is constantly monitored, then many seemingly absurd actions of humanity are easily explained. Here, people are poisoned with products with GMOs and chemicals, although there is no need for this, and the use of oil as the main source of energy, and the destruction of entire regions through drought and AIDS, and the arms race, while any war is 1,000 times more expensive of the world, and much more. At the same time, it should be recognized that someone protects us. The same regular cleaning of the atmosphere.According to V.Fomenko, a global catastrophe with irreversible glaciation would have happened to our planet long ago if THEY did not purify the atmosphere from beryllium and lead. And numerous asteroids, many times threatening to crash into the Earth? And always they fly past ... strangely somehow ...
Although there is another version. Researcher Kondratov Valery Pavlovich (see the video “The Fabric of the Universe. Part 5.”) suggested that our older “brothers” in mind live right there on the planet, only under water. There they mine their minerals. For example here:
And indeed, a flat, almost rectangular platform. And its edges look like after processing with a giant excavator:
The author cites many proofs of his version, I recommend to watch his video. We are also interested in his option of dumping waste rock to the continents by pumping through pipes. Hence the gross amount of sand.
Well, this is also an option. But he does not explain the drift of buildings in Russia.
Versions can be many, but you can not turn a blind eye to the facts. We would like our scientists to connect to the problem for real, and not to falsify and wave off.Yet they have more materials and experience in such work.
Here is a video option from youtube channel
- Spam, flood, etc. will be deleted! - All messages described as advertisements will be deleted, and users involved in such activities will be sent to the ban without warning!
Ancient civilizations covered with sand
Ancient civilizations covered with sand
Ancient civilizations covered with sand
Ancient civilizations covered with sand
Ancient civilizations covered with sand